If that is the case, then what place should government have within the American education system? They unfairly penalize poor students; they reduce children to the sum of a single score; and they discourage teacher creativity. One of the designs of No child left behind research essay was to give the parents insight into how the students and the schools were doing overall.
From the results of the test scores, the schools can be held accountable for either the increase or the declination of academic performance within their school. By making education a federal issue, the United States has successfully managed to increase federal spending without any increase in academic performance.
Perhaps making education an issue concerning the local communities, rather than making it a national issue. As time has progressed though, more and more people are being more and more dissatisfied with the act and we are thus moving closer to have it be rewritten in such a way that would create a better learning environment for students and that would be a better use of federal funds within the school system.
This allows for a more personalized education for the area and the people residing there. It is an issue for the local government and communities and should remain as such.
The main reason the Republican Party is displeased with the law is because the budget for the Department of Education has only increased and has accelerated even more than the spending on defense Antle, The American Conservative, In December school principals and administrators took a poll, most were in agreement that No Child Left Behind was fuel for strictly political gain or that it was created to subvert the powers that the school systems hold Education Week, The question still remains, what is the future of No Child Left Behind?
Although it may seem unclear as to how No Child Left Behind is supposed to be implemented into the school systems, the Federal Budget Project explained as follows: The future of No Child Left Behind is unquestionably on the minds of parents, teachers, students, and politicians across the nation.
Republicans are also disapproving of with the law and wish to see it reformed, Sen. Lamar Alexander even went so far as to suggest that standardized testing is completely done away with and removed from the education system Resmovits, Huffington Post, Democrats believe that No Child Left Behind has not lived up to its initial expectations by not focusing on the students who are considered minorities and the progress of their academic achievement Antle, The American Conservative, Other than that, tell me what you think.
No Child Left Behind has created much controversy and has brought a great deal of baggage in its wake. Individual schools, school districts and states must publicly report test results in the aggregate and for specific student subgroups, including low-income students, students with disabilities, English language learners, and major racial and ethnic groups.
A major stroke in the altering of No Child Left Behind came on June 7, when Republican John Kline submitted a piece of legislation that was designed to remove the parts of the act that were at least ten years old, this meant that 70 programs would be removed and that the federal government would not have as much of a hand in the educational system New York Times.
Now both parties have changed their views of the act and have turned against it wanting major type of reform. States must test students in science once in grades, and While the idea increasing of academic performance on a national scale sounds like a good idea, there are officials in over 40 states who disapprove of the notion and have suggested major changes be made to the law.
In addition to negatively making an impact on the political hemisphere, No Child Left Behind has proceeded to negatively impact Americans as a whole. Both parties agree that reform needs to take place with the law and that it did not fulfill its intended purpose.
Through understanding its history we can better understand the present effects that it has had on the political system. Every teacher must have the appropriate certifications and must be well versed in the subject that they are teaching in. From the inception of the No Child Left Behind Act ofit seems that it has only caused problems.
By May 30, brought the number of states who were granted waivers regarding NCLB to 19 by July 6, there were a total of 26 states freed from its clutches and on October 16, 36 states were introducing new evaluation policies to receive waivers from the law New York Times.
The original intent for this law was to encourage public schools to increase their academic performance, while creating an increase in student success.
For the local districts, in addition to displaying the performance of the students and the school, they must also include the academic performance of every school within the area The Federal Budget Project, While No Child Left Behind was supposed to increase academic performance it has only increased federal spending while levels of achievement have remained the same.
One of the only good things to come from the No Child Left Behind Act is that it has caused both parties to find some common ground. Most recently on March 22, is looked at being rewritten to get rid of the school punishments of those that do not pass the standardized tests, although, some are concerned that it would warrant schools to lower standards and would prevent funds being provided to the schools that need it most New York Times.
More people would prefer the law to be repealed or completely rewritten. While understanding the history of this act that was passed by the government helps us to understand what they were trying to do, we can clearly see that it did not achieve its goals.
Education is not, nor should it be an issue that is concerned by the federal government. Therefore, letting each local community deal with it allows for the freedom to create specific systems for the area and the demographics within the community.
During tha, there was an act passed that was entitled The Elementary and Secondary Education Act. While the future of this Law is a mystery it is the hope of many that we see it removed.
It can be clearly seen that the act takes a toll on both the parents and the teachers, but one also must consider the effect it has on the students.
There was a bill passed that allowed NCLB to be rewritten and would remove the amount of power that the government had in the decision making process on July 24,however, no Democrats voted for the bill and Obama considered vetoing it New York Times.
Both the democrats and the republicans can agree that this act was a complete failure. NCLB requires states to test students in reading and mathematics annually in grades and once in grades The previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, was enacted in NCLB represented a significant step forward for our nation’s children in many respects, particularly as it shined a light on where students were making progress and where they needed additional support, regardless of race, income, zip code, disability.
No Child Left Behind Essay. No Child Left Behind; Why we should rethink the current policy. Education was the focus of George W. Bush’s Presidential campaign in Using the improved Texas educational system as an example, President Bush promised to change education in America for the better.
No Child Left Behind Research Paper. No Child Left Behind Argumentative Essay. (wine-cloth.comessay) From the inception of the No Child Left Behind Act ofit seems that it has only caused problems. Both the democrats and the republicans can agree that this act was a complete failure. (Education Research, ).
No Child Left Behind is, “statistically flawed because it. Introduction. This paper researches the history of the causal problems that led to U.S.
government policy resulting in the No Child Left Behind Act. No Child Left Behind Policy of The No Child Left Behind Act of is a landmark in the education reform design to improve student achievement and change the culture of America’s schools.
(U.S. Department of Education, )This act will help put an end to discrimination, and promote responsibility.
The No Child Left Behind Act of President Bush signed The No Child Left Behind Act in as part of his educational reform plan. The plan includes four key principles: stronger accountability towards schools for performance results; expanded flexibility and local control; expanded options /5(18).Download